The Onam Paradox
You don’t find stories,
stories find you. Some stories find ways to reach you, as comics or movies. One
such story that fascinated me in my childhood was Mahabali and Vamana. King Mahabali
ruled Keralaputra, today’s Kerala. Vamana was an avatar of Lord Vishnu, who
came to Keralaputra and decimated the power of Mahabali, by sending him to the
underworld called Pataal.
Image Courtesy: Google |
Mahabali was, in fact,
a ‘good guy’. He led Keralaputra, through what could be called, its golden age.
Popular songs in the oral tradition corroborate this fact. Although Historians
in Kerala would not concede on the idea, Mahabali was a real human being and
not just a figment of popular imagination, let me guarantee you that
considering Mahabali as a physical reality will not deter one from the quest of
knowing, enjoying and re-telling his story. In fact, it will only add more
charm.
The original myth
suggests that Mahabali ruled his nation in such a fashion that it surpassed in
fame and effective handling of wealth the kingdoms ruled by Devas, the
demigods. Indra, the king of Devas decided to put an end to the rule of
Mahabali, since he thought the rule of Mahabali would be a threat to his own domineering
power. This story is strikingly similar to some modern political scenarios,
burning issues verging war, in how jealousy is core cause of many conflicts.
Image Courtesy: Google |
Indra, called for help
from Lord Vishnu, the superpower in Vedic times. Indra convinced Vishnu of the
profits of sabotaging Mahabali’s regime. Vishnu, however, was skeptical of a
ground attack and decided to send one of his Avatars, instead. This Avatar was
Vamana, a midget, who looked like a young brahmin. He came to Mahabali’s court.
Mahabali, by principle was a man of high ethical values, a trait his
descendants in Kerala lack in their personalities. Under pressure of his
ethical self, Mahabali agreed to satisfy the ‘brahmin youth’ by accepting his
wishes. No one had thought that a young brahmin can ask for anything that can
shake the base on an empire.
Vamana, the avatar of
Vishnu from North, asked the king of the South, three feet of land for him to
sit and meditate. Three feet of land sounded better than three thousand gold
coins. So Mahabali consented. Vamana took two feet, according to the legend,
and covered all available space on the earth as well as in the ether. Now,
there was no more space to put his third feet. Mahabali was bound by the
promise he gave to the dwarf. So he bowed down and bent his head in front of Vamana,
as the third space.
Vamana stepped over
Mahabali, but literally putting his feet over his head, and sent him downward
into the underworld known as Pataal. When Mahabali realized that he was
encountering the avatar of the mighty lord Vishnu, he had no other choice but
to cry out for sympathy. There was no other choice left.
Image Courtesy: Google |
Ignorant of the
implications, the descendants of Mahabali still celebrate this event as the ‘great
encounter’ with the god of Sustenance, Vishnu. This argument is validated in
the myth by providing a later part to the story that explains how Vishnu
granted a request of Mahabali out of sympathy. The helpless king implored that
he wished to come back to the physical world to ‘see’ his decedents. Vishnu,
according to the legend, in an extremely felicitous move granted the wish with
a small amendment. The lord from the North said, he would allow Mahabali take a
yearly visit to the earthly world. It is interesting to note that this legend
mirrors closely, various other myths and stories related to Spring festivals, in
many other cultures—in the portrayal of death and resurrection.
In Kerala, too, a
yearly celebration derives its roots from the legend of Mahabali—Onam. The
beloved king coming out of the underworld as the metaphor for a seed
germinating into a plant represents its closeness with Spring festivals. This
celebration, in Kerala, however, is known with the extremely sophisticated
title--”agricultural” festival. Although ‘agriculture’ denotes fertility and
germination of new life, it is restricted in a sense, representing products of
strictly executed laws of plantation, unlike ‘Spring’.
Image Courtesy: Google |
‘Spring’ represents a
more liberated side of life, than ‘agriculture’. In other words, the attempt to
address Onam, the Eastern counterpart of Spring festivals, in Kerala, as an
‘agricultural festival’ is also an attempt to prefer totalitarianism to
cultural liberation.
If we go back to the
myth of Mahabali, we may also find the story of a successful political invasion.
In his cunning diplomatic moves, Vishnu, the superpower usurped the kingdom of
Mahabali, and exiled him into the depths of darkness.
Folklore, songs, oral
tales stand as proofs for the legendary king Mahabali and his creative and
prosperous rule. If one analyses the myth in its current format, it is hard not
to be surprised at the paradox that is inherent inside this myth and the
celebration. If Mahabali actually was a good king, why did lord Vishnu exile
him?
An argument is that the
royal propagandists spread the legend of Mahabali in order to project the good
image of the king. This argument is valid and we can accept it too. But when we
consider the political implication of a powerful ruler usurping another kingdom
merely to satisfy someone else’s jealousy, the case is more serious.
Image Courtesy: Google |
I call this phenomenon
the ‘Onam Paradox’. This paradox, of a good king being exiled by the ‘god of Sustenance’,
Vishnu, is retained in school and college syllabi. As a child, when I read the
comic book with Mahabali and Vishnu as the characters, I asked myself the same
question; why did Mahabali suffer? Perhaps, you know the answer. This paradox
has never been addressed academically or publicly, even to this day. Then why
do we carry this myth in our minds unquestioningly, still? Perhaps, it is meant
to make people remember the humongous injustice done to Mahabali by one of the
‘lords’.
Stretching this idea a
bit farther, it becomes clear that Vishnu hadn’t actually relegated Mahabali by
exiling him. Such is the nature of this paradox. Although lord Vishnu was
forced to take a decision in favor of Indra, he maneuvered in the conditions provided
for Mahabali’s exile. Vishnu did it by giving never-ending life to the king! Mahabali
was given a chance to return from the exile, much like the Spring.
Comments
A different and interesting rendering of a cliché story