The reading process endows its inbuilt challenges upon the author. The act of reading what one has written is often a process full of wonders- wondering who wrote these lines or, wondering when I wrote this crap.
Those authors who are experienced in their craft know that only a scaffold of indifference can help us. First, they stand upon this scaffold and then observe the writing with a degree of distance and with an ample dose of indifference. Whatever comes up in this manuscript, I don't bother appreciating or criticising the author of this stuff.
This indifference can be identified with that earlier form of abstinence or ascetic zeal that we often read about in mythologies.
The first step in an editing process is reading the manuscript, which is always a process, filled with wonders, let me repeat.
If you are wondering why I am, suddenly coming back to one of the oldest questions that my blog dealt with in the past, the answer is that I am editing the new anthology that I am publishing.
The title of the said anthology is not revealed yet. It will be soon.
So what do you think is the second stage in the editing process? Do let me know in the comments below.